How did America allow such a travesty of justice to go unchallenged by the national media when the George W. Bush/Dick Cheney Administration decided to invade Iraq?Did congress decide to turn their heads and ignore the mounting stack of damnable lies that were being fed to the American People?
A lot of reasons were given by the administration and nearly as many were lies.
The reasons - in no particular order - included: Sadaam Hussein was a bad, bad man and had to be exterminated. (as were countless other dictators in the world.) Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction. (mysteriously, none could be found.) Iraq was a direct threat to the United States and we needed to eliminate that threat before they came to our shores. (even though we knew of no such threat because Al Qaeda had no real presence in Iraq at the time. They didn't rear their ugly head until after our invasion.) They were trying to buy plutonium from a country in Africa to make nuclear weapons. (no such proof could be made, and when one of our CIA agents claimed that story was false, his wife - also an agent - was "outted" by the Bush Administration as a U.S. spy, in revenge for uncovering their lie. For her own safety, she had to leave the Agency. A culprit was finally charged and sentenced to federal prison for revealing the agent's name, but that was of little comfort to her since she found herself unemployed for no good reason.)
Those horrible lies that were used for the invasion of Iraq, that killed several thousand and horribly wounded nearly thirty thousand of our bravest and best - not to mention the several hundred thousand Iraqi deaths and injuries - all very mysteriously got little-to-no screaming-banner-headlines that should have brought, at the very least, congressional investigations. (Doesn't the U.S. House investigate just about anything - including obvious witch hunts - these days?)
It is important to point out that there is no statute of limitations on this national disgrace, should any large national media outlet want to delve deeper. Wolfie, are you listening? You'll always need another BREAKING NEWS segment sometime.
At present, the entire Republican Party (yes, the same bunch) are now accusing President Obama of his terrible mishandling of the Iraq crisis. Most of them insist we need to go back in with full military "shock and awe" against ISIS and anyone else in "our" way. Think! This is a country in near-civil war mode, with three religious factions battling it out. Number one: No one can win a religious war unless genocide of one side is completed. Number two: America has no business sticking its nose under that camel tent.
Let's agree on one thing: If we had not invaded Iraq in the beginning, we would not be embroiled in trying to clean up the Bush/Cheney "theatre of lies." It might even make us wonder, "Where's Saddam when we need him?" At least he kept the country from a civil war." As for now, we can only hope for a safer America - like back in the "good ol' days" before Dubya and "Uncle Dick" decided to see how many billions of dollars they could round up for their government contractor friends (like Halliburton) who benefited so greatly from this unnecessary war!
Once in a while, you can pick up rumblings of Dubya being charged as a war criminal. Even more have included "Uncle Dick."
But who could bring themselves to go to Dallas and arrest that peaceful little guy while he's sitting at his easel - working on another masterpiece?
Once in a while, you can pick up rumblings of Dubya being charged as a war criminal. Even more have included "Uncle Dick."
But who could bring themselves to go to Dallas and arrest that peaceful little guy while he's sitting at his easel - working on another masterpiece?